eHealth PHS

client comments:

As discussed over phone, Consider following points given below.
• If a user have multiple ashablock assigned institutions, then an institution selection required before ashablock selection on the same ashablock selection screen.
• If only single ashablock assigned, institution selection will be auto populated.

• For the time being, you can proceed with ashablock selection only for piloting. Incorporate institution selection later along with PH supervisor handling changes.
• Role ID don't need to check for survey users as all have same functionalities apart from PH supervisor user role. But In services , role wise functionality access will be added.
• Institution transfer process -While reliving an employee in HMS , ashablock from user will be detached. So In app side detached ashablock wont be available for user.

________________________________
From: tharas@cdac.in
To: "BIYAS S" <biyas.ehk@kerala.gov.in>
Cc: "Anjaly Chandran" <anjalyc.ehk@kerala.gov.in>, "ANJU V.M" <anjuvm.ehk@kerala.gov.in>, "Aswathy R Nair" <aswathyrn.ehk@kerala.gov.in>, "VIVEK A. B." <vivekab.ehk@kerala.gov.in>, "Vinod Raj Varadarajan" <vinod.ehk@kerala.gov.in>, "rontgen ehk" <rontgen.ehk@kerala.gov.in>, "AKHILARAJ V J" <akhil.ehk@kerala.gov.in>, "Rajeshkumar N" <rajesh.ehk@kerala.gov.in>, "jiji pb" <jiji_pb@cdac.in>, chris@cdac.in, "aswathy mg" <aswathy.mg@cdac.in>, shameera@cdac.in, devanand@cdac.in, "sujithks ehk" <sujithks.ehk@kerala.gov.in>
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2023 7:45:34 PM
Subject: RE: app release - testing

Dear Biyas,

In continuation with communication in Whatsapp, Please comment on whether we can have the following approach to check app access eligibility for a user (JPHN/JHI/MLSP) and ASHA Block listing

• ASHA Block assigned to the user is determined by referring the table ph_ashablock_assign (only user id used, institutions not considered, may be from multiple institutions)
• The role ID of the user from keycloak falls in one of the following
"JPHN": 3, "JHI": 6, "FWC JPHN": 10, "BS JHI": 41, "MLSP staff Nurse": 53.

ie. Only userid-ashablock mapping and user's role considered. The institution and institution type of the user is not considered here.

• If user has no ASHA Block assigned, message will be No ASHA Block assigned to the user.
• If role is not valid, the message will be User is not allowed to access the app.

With this, please share what will be the approach for handling institution transfer.

client comments:

As discussed over phone, Consider following points given below.
• If a user have multiple ashablock assigned institutions, then an institution selection required before ashablock selection on the same ashablock selection screen.
• If only single ashablock assigned, institution selection will be auto populated.

• For the time being, you can proceed with ashablock selection only for piloting. Incorporate institution selection later along with PH supervisor handling changes.
• Role ID don't need to check for survey users as all have same functionalities apart from PH supervisor user role. But In services , role wise functionality access will be added.
• Institution transfer process -While reliving an employee in HMS , ashablock from user will be detached. So In app side detached ashablock wont be available for user.

________________________________
From: tharas@cdac.in
To: "BIYAS S" <biyas.ehk@kerala.gov.in>
Cc: "Anjaly Chandran" <anjalyc.ehk@kerala.gov.in>, "ANJU V.M" <anjuvm.ehk@kerala.gov.in>, "Aswathy R Nair" <aswathyrn.ehk@kerala.gov.in>, "VIVEK A. B." <vivekab.ehk@kerala.gov.in>, "Vinod Raj Varadarajan" <vinod.ehk@kerala.gov.in>, "rontgen ehk" <rontgen.ehk@kerala.gov.in>, "AKHILARAJ V J" <akhil.ehk@kerala.gov.in>, "Rajeshkumar N" <rajesh.ehk@kerala.gov.in>, "jiji pb" <jiji_pb@cdac.in>, chris@cdac.in, "aswathy mg" <aswathy.mg@cdac.in>, shameera@cdac.in, devanand@cdac.in, "sujithks ehk" <sujithks.ehk@kerala.gov.in>
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2023 7:45:34 PM
Subject: RE: app release - testing

Dear Biyas,

In continuation with communication in Whatsapp, Please comment on whether we can have the following approach to check app access eligibility for a user (JPHN/JHI/MLSP) and ASHA Block listing

• ASHA Block assigned to the user is determined by referring the table ph_ashablock_assign (only user id used, institutions not considered, may be from multiple institutions)
• The role ID of the user from keycloak falls in one of the following
"JPHN": 3, "JHI": 6, "FWC JPHN": 10, "BS JHI": 41, "MLSP staff Nurse": 53.

ie. Only userid-ashablock mapping and user's role considered. The institution and institution type of the user is not considered here.

• If user has no ASHA Block assigned, message will be No ASHA Block assigned to the user.
• If role is not valid, the message will be User is not allowed to access the app.

With this, please share what will be the approach for handling institution transfer.

update activity status

update activity status